DAO State
HomepageSocialGovernanceWallets
  • πŸ”DAO State Repository
  • Discussion Forum
  • Voting Space
  • Metagovernance
    • πŸ—ΊοΈDAO Overview
    • Community Governance
  • Agreements
    • Agreement Registry
    • 🀝Membership Agreements
      • Shared Values
      • Commitment to Accountability
      • UNA Operating Agreement
  • Policies
    • Policy Registry
    • πŸ›οΈGovernance Policies
      • Voting Policies
      • Proposal Standards
        • πŸ—οΈState Update Proposals
      • State Update Policy
        • Proposal Archive Page Template
  • Archives
    • πŸ—ƒοΈProposal Archive
      • Epoch 1 Proposals
        • AIFSIP-01: Adopt Initial Governance State
      • Epoch 0 Proposals
        • Proposal 01: Setup a Governance Team
        • Proposal 02: Set up a Partnerships Team
        • Proposal 03: Implement governance structure for AIFS
        • Proposal 04: Set up a Community Experience Team
    • πŸ’ΈTreasury Approvals
      • Mainnet Treasury Approvals
      • Polygon Treasury Approvals
    • πŸ”DAO State Changes
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Purpose
  • Design
  • Momentum
  • Detail
  • πŸ—³οΈ Voting Result
  • πŸ—οΈ Governance State Changes

Was this helpful?

  1. Archives
  2. Proposal Archive
  3. Epoch 0 Proposals

Proposal 03: Implement governance structure for AIFS

Proposal by yeoro.eth to implement a preliminary governance structure for AIFS

PreviousProposal 02: Set up a Partnerships TeamNextProposal 04: Set up a Community Experience Team

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

Proposed by: @Rowan

Submitted: 11/28/2022 Result: TBD βœ… ❌

Purpose

AIFS is an attempt to create a genuinely community led DAO that can flexibly move based on direction from diverse members of our network.

As we start to take action we risk falling on one of two sides of the path we want to take.

  • Either we don't have enough structure and we become a chaotic mess (especially as the volume of proposals greatly increases)

  • Or we have too much structure and we stifle community participation with over-burdensome governance process.

The governance team are proposing putting together a minimal set of governance features that can help AIFS move forward quickly in our current early stage, but that can evolve into a more robust governance architecture as we grow and evolve and things like NFT minting, sponsorship and community funding rounds become a reality.

Design

We are proposing to implement:

  1. Updated governance state on Github and Gitbook

  2. Updated contributor badging to implement contributor earned governance

  3. Simple proposal template/s to make it easier for community proposals to be written, improved and assessed by voters

  4. Proposal voting via snapshot

  5. Multi-sig Safe to hold initial Krause contribution and future funding (selection of multi-sig holders will be an open process)

We will work towards setting up an Unincorporated, Non-profit Association (UNA) with a legal wrapper in time for the launch of the NFT mechanism but this will come in a later proposal when it is more fully developed.

Momentum

The governance team has been working hard on getting these steps designed and are ready to implement them as soon as the proposal is passed. The governance team is also open to anyone in the community who wants to join.

Detail

By voting Agreeing on this proposal in the Telegram poll you are approving the implementation of step 1-5 outlined in the Design section of this proposal.

πŸ—³οΈ Voting Result

Votes: TBD Result: TBD

πŸ—οΈ Governance State Changes

TBD

πŸ—ƒοΈ
πŸ—£οΈ Clarity